Sarah Pi

15 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Sarah Pi
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Orthodontics 30
  • Aging 10
  • Pharmacology 82
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 8
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
Replace Domagoj Vidović with:
Domagoj Vidović Croatia
Ana Cristina de Oliveira Solis Brazil
Damien Etchecopar‐Etchart France
Ying Geng China
Rachel Weiss Canada
Raluca Matei United Kingdom
Tea Rosic Canada
Claire Friedrich United Kingdom
Sharaf Khan United States
Anaheed Shirazi United States
Sarah Pi relative to Domagoj Vidović Croatia Domagoj Vidović's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Domagoj Vidović · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Pi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Pi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Pi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Pi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Pi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Pi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Pi. The network helps show where Sarah Pi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Pi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Pi Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Pi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201363
2 201652
3 201337
4 201437
5
Patient-reported outcomes before and after treatment of major depressive disorder.
201431
6 201323
7 201822
8 201322
9 201320
10
The impact of spirituality before and after treatment of major depressive disorder.
201416
11 202013
12 201910
13 20188
14 20184
15 20181

About Sarah Pi

Sarah Pi is a scholar working on Orthodontics, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Surgery, having authored 15 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (5 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (30 citations), Aging (10 citations), Pharmacology (82 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (8 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (8 citations). Sarah Pi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Waguih William IsHak, James Mirocha, Eric D. Peselow, Robert M. Cohen, Kara Bagot, David M. James, Gerald Nelson, David C. Hatcher, Katherine L. Collison and Snehlata Oberoi. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, CNS Spectrums, Progress in Orthodontics, Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics and Depression and Anxiety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact