Barbara Pees
Impact in
- Aging top 1%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
- Aging 16
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 16
-
- Gut microbiota and health 11
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
- Co-authors
- Hinrich Schulenburg (9 shared papers)Wentao Yang (6 shared papers)Katja Dierking (9 shared papers)Carola Petersen (6 shared papers)Philip Rosenstiel (3 shared papers)Thiago Guzella (1 shared paper)Henrique Teotónio (1 shared paper)Matthias Leippe (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (3 papers)mBio (2 papers)PLoS Pathogens (2 papers)Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)Environmental Microbiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Barbara Pees
17 papers receiving 488 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Aging 193
- Biological Psychiatry 44
- Insect Science 82
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 30
- Immunology 86
Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Pees
This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Pees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Pees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Pees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Pees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Pees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Pees. The network helps show where Barbara Pees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Pees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 99 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 |
About Barbara Pees
Barbara Pees is a scholar working on Aging, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 18 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (16 papers), Gut microbiota and health (11 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (193 citations), Biological Psychiatry (44 citations), Insect Science (82 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (30 citations) and Immunology (86 citations). Barbara Pees has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Hinrich Schulenburg, Wentao Yang, Katja Dierking, Carola Petersen, Philip Rosenstiel, Thiago Guzella, Henrique Teotónio, Matthias Leippe, Andrei Papkou and Kohar Annie B. Kissoyan. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, mBio, PLoS Pathogens, Ecology and Evolution and Environmental Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.