Progress in Orthodontics

700 papers and 12.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 700 papers published in Progress in Orthodontics in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Orthodontics usually cover Orthodontics (537 papers), Oral Surgery (293 papers) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (220 papers) specifically the topics of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (510 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (220 papers) and dental development and anomalies (188 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Orthodontics are Ali Borzabadi‐Farahani, Gíuseppe Siciliani, Carlos Flores‐Mir, Luca Lombardo, Kyung-Min Lee, Alberto Caprioglio, Vahid Rakhshan, Theodore Eliades, Nikolaos Pandis and Chung How Kau.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Orthodontics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Orthodontics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Orthodontics.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Orthodontics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Orthodontics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Orthodontics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Orthodontics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025