Sarah E. Squire

51 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Sarah E. Squire
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Sensory Systems 131
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 367
  • Statistics and Probability 140
  • Rehabilitation 101
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 309
Replace Wolfgang Staffen with:
Wolfgang Staffen Austria
Beth Wilmot United States
Anna W. Byars United States
Andy J. Wills United Kingdom
Ruth Seurinck Belgium
Vishal Kapoor Germany
Chiara Cerami Italy
Myriam Peyrard‐Janvid Sweden
Caroline Witton United Kingdom
Xinyi Xu China
Sarah E. Squire relative to Wolfgang Staffen Austria Wolfgang Staffen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Wolfgang Staffen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Squire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Squire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Squire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Squire more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Squire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Squire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Squire. The network helps show where Sarah E. Squire may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Squire, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Squire Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Squire links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003327
2 2008214
3 2011152
4 2002135
5 200683
6 201573
7 200965
8 200163
9 202152
10 200151
11 199850
12 200247
13 201944
14 200243
15 199941
16 201937
17 201733
18 202131
19 202231
20 201831

About Sarah E. Squire

Sarah E. Squire is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Rehabilitation, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (17 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (6 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (5 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (4 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (131 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (367 citations), Statistics and Probability (140 citations), Rehabilitation (101 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (309 citations). Sarah E. Squire has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Charles J. Spence, Peter Bryant, Kay Elizabeth Davies, Alan L. Stein, Silvio Zaina, Michael David Chan, Karen Jean Marcus, Benjamin Edwards, Arran Babbs and Simon Guiraud. Their work appears in journals such as Human Molecular Genetics, Neuromuscular Disorders, British journal of surgery, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact