Genetics

642.6k papers and 16.3M indexed citations i.

About

642.6k papers covering Genetics have received a total of 16.3M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders, Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research and also cover the fields of Hematology, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Molecular Biology, Hematology and Surgery. Some of the most active scholars covering Genetics are Arnold I. Caplan, Darwin J. Prockop, Ayalew Tefferi, Tomas Ganz, Hagop M. Kantarjian, D. J. Weatherall, Paul Kleihues, Jorge E. Cortés, David N. Louis and Mark F. Pittenger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Genetics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025