Sara Steen

2.6k citations
36 papers · 1.5k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Sara Steen

32 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Sara Steen
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Clinical Psychology 666
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
  • General Decision Sciences 34
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
  • General Health Professions 231
Replace Gordon Hawkins with:
Gordon Hawkins United States
Anne Morrison Piehl United States
David Indermaur Australia
Norval Morris United States
Paul Hirschfield United States
Hazel Kemshall United Kingdom
Robert Apel United States
Adam Fine United States
Chester Britt United States
Joshua C. Cochran United States
Sara Steen relative to Gordon Hawkins United States Gordon Hawkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Gordon Hawkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Steen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Steen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Steen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Steen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Steen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Steen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Steen. The network helps show where Sara Steen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Sara Steen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Steen Line = papers co-authored together Sara Steen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998482
2 2004248
3 2005160
4 2002158
5 2000110
6 200659
7 200749
8 201232
9 200929
10 200528
11
When Process Affects Punishment: Differences in Sentences After Guilty Plea, Bench Trial, and Jury Trial in Five Guidelines States
200527
12 199725
13 200619
14 199919
15
The Letters of Lady Arbella Stuart
199417
16 201215
17 200115
18 200415
19 19886
20 19915

About Sara Steen

Sara Steen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences and General Health Professions, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (666 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.2k citations), General Decision Sciences (34 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations) and General Health Professions (231 citations). Sara Steen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include George S. Bridges, Rodney L. Engen, Mark A. Cohen, Roland T. Rust, Simon T. Tidd, Randy R. Gainey, Tara Opsal, Stephen Orgel, Arabella Stuart and Peter Lovegrove. Their work appears in journals such as Justice Quarterly, Sixteenth Century Journal, Teaching Sociology, Criminology and Punishment & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact