Countries where authors publish in Sixteenth Century Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sixteenth Century Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sixteenth Century Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal.
About Sixteenth Century Journal
The 4.9k papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal in the last decades have received a total of 47.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal usually cover Classics (1.7k papers), History (3.2k papers), Conservation (182 papers), Religious studies (291 papers) and Museology (117 papers) specifically the topics of Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1.8k papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (1.5k papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (804 papers), Medieval and Early Modern Justice (242 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (239 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (238 papers), Medieval Literature and History (234 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (226 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sixteenth Century Journal are William E. Burns, Ronald H. Fritze, Robert C. Evans, Michael T. Walton, Stanford Lehmberg, John F. Schwaller, Nicholas Terpstra, Charles G. Nauert, Thomas F. Mayer and Christiane L. Joost‐Gaugier.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.