Ruth Strang
Impact in
-
- Reading and Literacy Development
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
-
- Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Papers in
-
- Diverse Education Studies and Reforms 2
-
- Literacy, Media, and Education 2
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 1
Ruth Strang
21 papers receiving 127 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 79
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
- Education 99
- Safety Research 12
- Social Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Strang
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Strang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Strang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Strang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Strang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Strang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Strang. The network helps show where Ruth Strang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Strang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diagnostic teaching of reading | 1964 | 46 |
| 2 | 1954 | 45 | |
| 3 | 1968 | 25 | |
| 4 | Helping your gifted child | 1960 | 22 |
| 5 | 1965 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1957 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1956 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1967 | 8 | |
| 9 | Guidance in the Classroom | 1964 | 5 |
| 10 | The administrator and the improvement of reading | 1960 | 4 |
| 11 | 1952 | 4 | |
| 12 | Group work in education | 1958 | 3 |
| 13 | 1962 | 3 | |
| 14 | Study type of reading exercises : college level | 1951 | 2 |
| 15 | Ruth M. Strang | 1971 | 2 |
| 16 | Guided Study and Homework. What Research Says to the Teacher Series. No. 8. | 1968 | 2 |
| 17 | 1955 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 20 | How to report pupil progress | 1955 | 1 |
About Ruth Strang
Ruth Strang is a scholar working on Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Speech and Hearing and Gender Studies, having authored 33 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (2 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (2 papers), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (79 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations), Education (99 citations), Safety Research (12 citations) and Social Psychology (26 citations). Ruth Strang has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ralph J. Roberts and W. Lloyd Warner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Teacher Education, Exceptional Children, Journal of Educational Psychology, Reading Research Quarterly and Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.