Ruth Oniang’o

46 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

Ruth Oniang’o
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 236
  • Forestry 27
  • Business and International Management 12
  • Food Science 109
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38
Replace Archileo N. Kaaya with:
Archileo N. Kaaya Uganda
Peter Mamiro Tanzania
Mary Khakoni Walingo Kenya
Gudrun B. Keding Germany
Namukolo Covic South Africa
Xikombiso Mbhenyane South Africa
Judith Kimiywe Kenya
Gervais Ntandou-Bouzitou Italy
J. Raneri Italy
Friede Wenhold South Africa
Ruth Oniang’o relative to Archileo N. Kaaya Uganda Archileo N. Kaaya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Archileo N. Kaaya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Oniang’o

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Oniang’o's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Oniang’o with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Oniang’o more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Oniang’o

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Oniang’o. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Oniang’o. The network helps show where Ruth Oniang’o may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Oniang’o, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Oniang’o Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Oniang’o links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Contemporary African food habits and their nutritional and health implications.
2003105
2 200265
3 200558
4 200744
5 202140
6 200426
7 202218
8 199917
9 200717
10 199316
11 201515
12 200014
13 200211
14 199011
15 200711
16 20029
17 20199
18
The Maasai food system and food and nutrition security.
20098
19 19988
20 20065

About Ruth Oniang’o

Ruth Oniang’o is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science, General Health Professions, Safety Research and Soil Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Nutrition and Water Access (4 papers), Food composition and properties (3 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (2 papers) and Seed and Plant Biochemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (236 citations), Forestry (27 citations), Business and International Management (12 citations), Food Science (109 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (38 citations). Ruth Oniang’o has collaborated with scholars based in Kenya, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Simon Muhoho Njoroge, Anselimo Makokha, Eileen Kennedy, Victoria J. Quinn, Sandra L. Huffman, Khama Rogo, Sylvester O. Oikeh, Hilary Green, B. Erasmus and Richard A. Daynard. Their work appears in journals such as Food and Nutrition Bulletin, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Development and Change, Journal of Nutrition and Journal of Food Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact