Development and Change

2.1k papers and 59.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Development and Change in the last decades have received a total of 59.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Development and Change usually cover Sociology and Political Science (956 papers), Political Science and International Relations (607 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (351 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (244 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (175 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Development and Change are Naila Kabeer, John Friedmann, Arun Agrawal, Christian Lund, David Mosse, Jean‐Philippe Platteau, Jan Nederveen Pieterse, Maxine Molyneux, Linda Mayoux and Tania Murray Li.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Development and Change

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Development and Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Development and Change.

Countries where authors publish in Development and Change

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Development and Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Development and Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development and Change more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025