Ruth Endacott

196 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Ruth Endacott
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Research and Theory 302
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 703
  • Emergency Medical Services 825
  • Family Practice 216
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 121
Replace Marion Mitchell with:
Marion Mitchell Australia
Sok Ying Liaw Singapore
Julie Considine Australia
Virginia Plummer Australia
Mari Botti Australia
Brigid M. Gillespie Australia
Daphne Stannard United States
Milisa Manojlovich United States
Margaret Fry Australia
Alison M. Hutchinson Australia
Ruth Endacott relative to Marion Mitchell Australia Marion Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marion Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Endacott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Endacott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Endacott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Endacott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Endacott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Endacott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Endacott. The network helps show where Ruth Endacott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Endacott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Endacott Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Endacott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 203 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003364
2 2010157
3 2012153
4 2010128
5 2007110
6 201090
7 200785
8 201183
9 200678
10 201476
11 202071
12 201069
13 200469
14 200968
15 201368
16 201067
17 201161
18 200360
19 201659
20 202154

About Ruth Endacott

Ruth Endacott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 203 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (42 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (32 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (28 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (20 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (19 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (19 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (18 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (302 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (703 citations), Emergency Medical Services (825 citations), Family Practice (216 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (121 citations). Ruth Endacott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julie Scholes, Simon Cooper, Mirjam McMullan, Morag Gray, Melanie Jasper, Christine Webb, Wendy Chaboyer, Carolyn Miller, Leigh Kinsman and Tracy McConnell‐Henry. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Australian Critical Care and Nursing in Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact