Ruth Endacott

197 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Ruth Endacott
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Research and Theory 209
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 329
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 285
  • Emergency Medical Services 403
  • Family Practice 104
Replace Marion Mitchell with:
Marion Mitchell Australia
Barbara J. Daly United States
Daphne Stannard United States
Sok Ying Liaw Singapore
Milisa Manojlovich United States
Julie Considine Australia
Fazlollah Ahmadi Iran
Virginia Plummer Australia
Jane Barnsteiner United States
Catherine A. Chesla United States
Ruth Endacott relative to Marion Mitchell Australia Marion Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Marion Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Endacott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Endacott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Endacott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Endacott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Endacott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Endacott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Endacott. The network helps show where Ruth Endacott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Endacott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Endacott Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Endacott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 203 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003366
2 2010158
3 2012155
4 2010131
5 2007113
6 201094
7 200785
8 201184
9 201478
10 200678
11 202073
12 200470
13 201069
14 200968
15 201368
16 201067
17 201163
18 201663
19 200359
20 202158

About Ruth Endacott

Ruth Endacott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology, having authored 203 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (22 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (17 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (15 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (14 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Nursing education and management (9 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (209 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (329 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (285 citations), Emergency Medical Services (403 citations) and Family Practice (104 citations). Ruth Endacott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julie Scholes, Simon Cooper, Mirjam McMullan, Christine Webb, Melanie Jasper, Morag Gray, Wendy Chaboyer, Leigh Kinsman, Carolyn Miller and Tracy McConnell‐Henry. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Australian Critical Care and Nursing in Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact