Marion Mitchell

151 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Marion Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Research and Theory 259
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 1.2k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 732
  • Family Practice 157
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 76
Replace Ruth Endacott with:
Ruth Endacott United Kingdom
Daphne Stannard United States
Ida Torunn Bjørk Norway
Isabel Higgins Australia
Mari Botti Australia
Mathy Mezey United States
Fiona Bogossian Australia
Mary Beth Happ United States
Sharon Kaasalainen Canada
Marita G. Titler United States
Marion Mitchell relative to Ruth Endacott United Kingdom Ruth Endacott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ruth Endacott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marion Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marion Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marion Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marion Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marion Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marion Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marion Mitchell. The network helps show where Marion Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marion Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marion Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Marion Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 155 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009164
2 2008124
3 2018117
4 201593
5 201685
6 201178
7 201077
8 201771
9 201665
10 201658
11 201758
12 200357
13 201857
14 201555
15 201755
16 201753
17 201751
18 201750
19 201650
20 201248

About Marion Mitchell

Marion Mitchell is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 155 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (64 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (35 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (25 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (22 papers), Nursing education and management (16 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (14 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (12 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (259 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (1.2k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (732 citations), Family Practice (157 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (76 citations). Marion Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Chaboyer, Marie Cooke, Amy N.B. Johnston, Amanda Henderson, Andrea P. Marshall, Leanne M. Aitken, Frances Lin, Elizabeth Burmeister, Elisabeth Coyne and Jenny Murfield. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Critical Care, Nurse Education Today, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Nurse Education in Practice and Intensive and Critical Care Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact