John Edington

855 citations
10 papers · 547 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John Edington

10 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

John Edington
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Emergency Medicine 258
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 85
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 57
  • Emergency Medical Services 63
  • Neurology 99
Replace Amélia G. Reis with:
Amélia G. Reis Brazil
Bryan E Bledsoe United States
Janice A. Tijssen Canada
Maria Ramundo United States
Todd A. Seigel United States
Michael P. Poirier United States
Martin Messelken Germany
Catherine Bertrand France
David Brewster Australia
Lawrence Mottley United States
John Edington relative to Amélia G. Reis Brazil Amélia G. Reis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Amélia G. Reis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Edington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Edington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Edington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Edington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Edington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Edington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Edington. The network helps show where John Edington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Edington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Edington Line = papers co-authored together John Edington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2010227
2 200785
3 201085
4 200948
5 201334
6 199732
7 196820
8
Patients want to know about the 'cardiac blues'.
201511
9 20134
10 20081

About John Edington

John Edington is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, General Health Professions and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper), Restraint-Related Deaths (1 paper) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (258 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (85 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (57 citations), Emergency Medical Services (63 citations) and Neurology (99 citations). John Edington has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Chaboyer, Ruth Endacott, Paul S. Myles, Lynne Murray, Karen Smith, Tony Walker, Vina P. Nguyen, Peter Cameron, Rodney Judson and Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Annals of Surgery, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact