Ruth E. Johnson

94 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Ruth E. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 244
  • Developmental Neuroscience 202
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 907
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 498
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 312
Replace Abraham A. Palmer with:
Abraham A. Palmer United States
Zdenka Pausová Canada
Greer M. Murphy United States
Dorit Carmelli United States
Nick Craddock United Kingdom
Louis Richer Canada
Artūras Petronis Canada
Marco P. Boks Netherlands
Eef Hogervorst United Kingdom
Andrea Schmitt Germany
Ruth E. Johnson relative to Abraham A. Palmer United States Abraham A. Palmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Abraham A. Palmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Johnson. The network helps show where Ruth E. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981240
2 1975208
3 1976163
4 2009163
5 2007160
6 2011158
7 1975141
8 1982131
9 1983129
10 1983108
11 198595
12 200183
13 196682
14
Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study.
200680
15 195576
16 198074
17 197770
18 201966
19 197159
20 197956

About Ruth E. Johnson

Ruth E. Johnson is a scholar working on Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 96 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fatty Acid Research and Health (12 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (8 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers) and Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (244 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (202 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (907 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (498 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (312 citations). Ruth E. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marian C. Diamond, Hans Kaunitz, M. Hassan Murad, Charles A. Slanetz, Glenna Dowling, Mark R. Rosenzweig, Edward L. Bennett, Bernd W. Scheithauer, Ardis J. Lostroh and James R. Connor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Experimental Neurology, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Mayo Clinic Proceedings and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact