Ruth E. Johnson

93 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Ruth E. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 238
  • Developmental Neuroscience 193
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 809
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 454
  • Dermatology 192
Replace Carmen Martín-Ruiz with:
Carmen Martín-Ruiz United Kingdom
Ru‐Band Lu Taiwan
Marco Aurélio Romano‐Silva Brazil
Bertram Müller‐Myhsok Germany
Timothy J. Cunningham United States
Giuseppe Cibelli Italy
Antonio Pérez Spain
H. P. F. Koppeschaar Netherlands
Po‐Hsiu Kuo Taiwan
Gary Price United Kingdom
Ruth E. Johnson relative to Carmen Martín-Ruiz United Kingdom Carmen Martín-Ruiz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Carmen Martín-Ruiz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Johnson. The network helps show where Ruth E. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981216
2 1975185
3 2007154
4 2011152
5 1976151
6 2009141
7 1982120
8 1983118
9 1975114
10 198396
11 198585
12
Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study.
200677
13 200175
14 196669
15 198064
16 201963
17 195561
18 197759
19 197952
20 200251

About Ruth E. Johnson

Ruth E. Johnson is a scholar working on Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 95 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fatty Acid Research and Health (12 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (8 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (6 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (238 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (193 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (809 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (454 citations) and Dermatology (192 citations). Ruth E. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Marian C. Diamond, Hans Kaunitz, M. Hassan Murad, Charles A. Slanetz, Glenna Dowling, Mark R. Rosenzweig, Edward L. Bennett, Bernd W. Scheithauer, Ardis J. Lostroh and Greer M. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Experimental Neurology, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Mayo Clinic Proceedings and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact