Rune Lines

1.5k citations
35 papers · 936 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Rune Lines

30 papers receiving 823 citations

Peers

Rune Lines
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 507
  • Strategy and Management 251
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 27
  • Communication 78
  • Public Administration 31
Replace Wendy S. Harman with:
Wendy S. Harman United States
Myungweon Choi South Korea
Mike Schraeder United States
J. Lee Whittington United States
Greg G. Wang United States
Yunhyung Chung United States
Badrinarayan Shankar Pawar India
J.J. van Muijen Netherlands
Walter G. Tymon United States
Zachary Sheaffer Israel
Rune Lines relative to Wendy S. Harman United States Wendy S. Harman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Wendy S. Harman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rune Lines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rune Lines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rune Lines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rune Lines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rune Lines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rune Lines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rune Lines. The network helps show where Rune Lines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Rune Lines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rune Lines Line = papers co-authored together Rune Lines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004256
2 2005142
3 2015118
4 2005117
5 200764
6 201223
7 200423
8 202022
9 200518
10 200518
11
New perspectives on organizational change and learning
200518
12 201217
13 199514
14 201412
15 202011
16 201210
17 20078
18 20007
19 20166
20 20145

About Rune Lines

Rune Lines is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 936 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (14 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (12 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (507 citations), Strategy and Management (251 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (27 citations), Communication (78 citations) and Public Administration (31 citations). Rune Lines has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Chile and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Nekane Aramburu, Marcus Selart, Svein Tvedt Johansen, Bjarne Espedal, Ghulam Mustafa, Jon Martin Denstadli, Kjell Grønhaug, Ann Langley, Vidar Schei and Inger G. Stensaker. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Marketing, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, International Journal of Market Research, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management and Journal of Organizational Change Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact