Rune Lines

1.5k citations
32 papers · 988 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Rune Lines

28 papers receiving 867 citations

Peers

Rune Lines
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 531
  • Strategy and Management 272
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 30
  • Communication 85
  • Public Administration 34
Replace Myungweon Choi with:
Myungweon Choi South Korea
Yunhyung Chung United States
Wendy S. Harman United States
Mike Schraeder United States
Jaap J. van Muijen Netherlands
Iain L. Densten Australia
J. Lee Whittington United States
Zachary Sheaffer Israel
Walter G. Tymon United States
Greg G. Wang United States
Rune Lines relative to Myungweon Choi South Korea Myungweon Choi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Myungweon Choi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rune Lines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rune Lines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rune Lines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rune Lines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rune Lines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rune Lines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rune Lines. The network helps show where Rune Lines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Rune Lines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rune Lines Line = papers co-authored together Rune Lines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004273
2 2005144
3 2015132
4 2005124
5 200769
6 201225
7 200424
8 202022
9 200521
10
New perspectives on organizational change and learning
200521
11 200517
12 201217
13 201415
14 199514
15 202013
16 201211
17 20079
18 20007
19 20167
20 20115

About Rune Lines

Rune Lines is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Communication, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management and Marketing, having authored 32 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (13 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (11 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (531 citations), Strategy and Management (272 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (30 citations), Communication (85 citations) and Public Administration (34 citations). Rune Lines has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Chile and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Nekane Aramburu, Marcus Selart, Ghulam Mustafa, Svein Tvedt Johansen, Bjarne Espedal, Jon Martin Denstadli, Kjell Grønhaug, Inger G. Stensaker, Ann Langley and Vidar Schei. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, International Journal of Market Research, European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Workplace Learning and International Journal of Cross Cultural Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact