Roberto Anedda

61 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Roberto Anedda
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Aquatic Science 194
  • Insect Science 153
  • Animal Science and Zoology 85
  • Food Science 135
  • Analytical Chemistry 67
Replace Riccardo Stradi with:
Riccardo Stradi Italy
Masahiro Ando Japan
David Rudd Australia
Ragnar Jóhannsson Iceland
Yinjian Zheng China
Arianna Piersanti Italy
Keiji Shikama Japan
Lenize F. Maia Brazil
Stephen H. Bishop United States
Jinqing Huang China
Roberto Anedda relative to Riccardo Stradi Italy Riccardo Stradi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Riccardo Stradi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Anedda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Anedda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Anedda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Anedda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Anedda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Anedda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Anedda. The network helps show where Roberto Anedda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Anedda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Anedda Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Anedda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201167
2 201951
3 200747
4 201644
5 201543
6 201843
7 200842
8 200741
9 200835
10 201134
11 202232
12 201129
13 200929
14 200929
15 201029
16 201427
17 202225
18 201424
19 201519
20 201318

About Roberto Anedda

Roberto Anedda is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Aquatic Science, Food Science, Materials Chemistry and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (13 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (5 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (5 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (4 papers) and Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (194 citations), Insect Science (153 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (85 citations), Food Science (135 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (67 citations). Roberto Anedda has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Arab Emirates and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tonina Roggio, Riccardo Melis, Sergio Uzzau, Mariano Casu, Roberta Sanna, Roberto Cappuccinelli, Massimiliano Peana, Maria Antonietta Zoroddu, Serenella Medici and Paolo Ruggerone. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Data in Brief, Molecules, Marine Environmental Research and Food Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact