Roberto Anedda

56 papers receiving 902 citations

Peers

Roberto Anedda
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Aquatic Science 185
  • Insect Science 138
  • Animal Science and Zoology 76
  • Food Science 117
  • Analytical Chemistry 60
Replace David Rudd with:
David Rudd Australia
Elfrieda Fodor Hungary
Riccardo Stradi Italy
Ragnar Jóhannsson Iceland
Yinjian Zheng China
James M. Hungerford United States
Lenize F. Maia Brazil
Arianna Piersanti Italy
Keiji Shikama Japan
W. Patrick Williams United Kingdom
Roberto Anedda relative to David Rudd Australia David Rudd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
David Rudd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Anedda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Anedda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Anedda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Anedda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Anedda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Anedda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Anedda. The network helps show where Roberto Anedda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Anedda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Anedda Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Anedda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201166
2 201947
3 200746
4 201643
5 201543
6 201841
7 200841
8 200739
9 200835
10 201130
11 200929
12 201029
13 202228
14 201128
15 200927
16 201421
17 201419
18 201617
19 201917
20 201315

About Roberto Anedda

Roberto Anedda is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Aquatic Science, Food Science, Materials Chemistry and Ecology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 932 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (13 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (6 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (5 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (5 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (185 citations), Insect Science (138 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (76 citations), Food Science (117 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (60 citations). Roberto Anedda has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Arab Emirates and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Riccardo Melis, Tonina Roggio, Sergio Uzzau, Mariano Casu, Roberta Sanna, Matteo Ceccarelli, Roberto Cappuccinelli, Serenella Medici, Paolo Ruggerone and Massimiliano Peana. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Food Research International, Dalton Transactions, Molecules and Marine Environmental Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact