Luca Pretti

527 citations
21 papers · 427 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Luca Pretti

20 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Luca Pretti
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Biochemistry 83
  • Food Science 230
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 19
  • Animal Science and Zoology 67
  • Biotechnology 47
Replace Ana Sofia Oliveira with:
Ana Sofia Oliveira Portugal
Ana Roldán Spain
Mingzheng Huang China
Mahesh Chandra India
Jean-Luc Luisier Switzerland
Luca Tommasi Italy
Carmela Terracone Italy
Mara Banović Croatia
M. Morassut Italy
Gui‐Ran Kim South Korea
Luca Pretti relative to Ana Sofia Oliveira Portugal Ana Sofia Oliveira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Ana Sofia Oliveira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luca Pretti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luca Pretti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luca Pretti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luca Pretti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luca Pretti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luca Pretti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luca Pretti. The network helps show where Luca Pretti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luca Pretti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luca Pretti Line = papers co-authored together Luca Pretti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200975
2 201554
3 201143
4 201130
5 201929
6 201829
7 201426
8 201620
9 201918
10 201818
11 201215
12 199714
13 201313
14 202210
15 201710
16 20219
17 20225
18 20234
19 20223
20 20232

About Luca Pretti

Luca Pretti is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Biochemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (11 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (8 papers), Hops Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (2 papers), Celiac Disease Research and Management (2 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (83 citations), Food Science (230 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (19 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (67 citations) and Biotechnology (47 citations). Luca Pretti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Qatar and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Maria Cristina Porcu, Nicola Secchi, Luca Mercenaro, Tonina Roggio, Vanna Sanna, Roberto Cappuccinelli, Giovanni Nieddu, Alessandra Del, Vittorio Tedde and Marco Campus. Their work appears in journals such as Fermentation, Food Chemistry, Molecules, Applied Sciences and Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact