Reg Dennick

17.4k citations
58 papers · 2.1k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Reg Dennick

57 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Reg Dennick
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Family Practice 147
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 382
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 555
  • Education 558
  • General Dentistry 23
Replace Dean X. Parmelee with:
Dean X. Parmelee United States
Mitra Amini Iran
Renée E. Stalmeijer Netherlands
Jill Gordon Australia
Anthony J Levinson Canada
Nancy Adams United States
Rashmi A. Kusurkar Netherlands
Jorge G. Ruiz United States
Casey White United States
Marcel D’Eon Canada
Reg Dennick relative to Dean X. Parmelee United States Dean X. Parmelee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Dean X. Parmelee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reg Dennick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reg Dennick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reg Dennick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reg Dennick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reg Dennick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reg Dennick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reg Dennick. The network helps show where Reg Dennick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Reg Dennick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reg Dennick Line = papers co-authored together Reg Dennick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
MAKING SENSE OF CRONBACHS ALPHA
2011223
2 2016143
3 2008139
4 2011134
5 2011105
6 2010104
7 201297
8 201197
9
Small Group Teaching: Tutorials, Seminars and Beyond
200474
10 201371
11 201265
12
Giving a Lecture: From Presenting to Teaching
200465
13 200264
14 201258
15 200952
16 201043
17 200942
18 200439
19 201637
20 200837

About Reg Dennick

Reg Dennick is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Family Practice, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (22 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (8 papers), Radiology practices and education (6 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (6 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (147 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (382 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (555 citations), Education (558 citations) and General Dentistry (23 citations). Reg Dennick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Mohsen Tavakol, Kate Exley, Mohammad Ali Mohagheghi, Mohammad Rahimi‐Madiseh, Jafar Nasiri, Peter Thurley, Rajesh Patel, R. A. Hammond, Iain Robbé and Liz Mossop. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Medical Education, BMC Medical Education, Academic Medicine and Clinical Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact