Reg Dennick

16.7k citations
55 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Reg Dennick

55 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Reg Dennick
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Family Practice 311
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 930
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 430
  • Education 560
  • Research and Theory 15
Replace David Taylor with:
David Taylor United Kingdom
Jane Kidd United Kingdom
Mitra Amini Iran
Arno M. M. Muijtjens Netherlands
Trevor Gibbs United Kingdom
Claudio Violato Canada
Eugène J. F. M. Custers Netherlands
Malathi Srinivasan United States
Casey White United States
Anthony J Levinson Canada
Reg Dennick relative to David Taylor United Kingdom David Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reg Dennick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reg Dennick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reg Dennick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reg Dennick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reg Dennick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reg Dennick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reg Dennick. The network helps show where Reg Dennick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Reg Dennick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reg Dennick Line = papers co-authored together Reg Dennick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
MAKING SENSE OF CRONBACHS ALPHA
2011216
2 2008132
3 2011130
4 2016122
5 201099
6 201198
7 201195
8 201289
9 201369
10
Small Group Teaching: Tutorials, Seminars and Beyond
200464
11 201261
12
Giving a Lecture: From Presenting to Teaching
200459
13 200256
14 201255
15 200948
16 201042
17 200940
18 200437
19 200836
20 201233

About Reg Dennick

Reg Dennick is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Family Practice, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (28 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (11 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers), Radiology practices and education (7 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (7 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (5 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (311 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (930 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (430 citations), Education (560 citations) and Research and Theory (15 citations). Reg Dennick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Mohsen Tavakol, Kate Exley, Mohammad Ali Mohagheghi, Mohammad Rahimi‐Madiseh, Jafar Nasiri, Peter Thurley, Iain Robbé, R. A. Hammond, Liz Mossop and Rajesh Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Medical Education, BMC Medical Education, The Clinical Teacher and Clinical Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact