Clinical Radiology

10.0k papers and 161.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.0k papers published in Clinical Radiology in the last decades have received a total of 161.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Radiology usually cover Surgery (3.9k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (3.1k papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.5k papers) specifically the topics of Radiation Dose and Imaging (586 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (516 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (508 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Radiology are A. Saifuddin, David J. Wilson, Anil T. Ahuja, Frank Ellis, David M. Hansell, Paul S. Sidhu, Andrew Scarsbrook, Adrian K. Dixon, Ellis Barnett and Steve Connor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Radiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Radiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Radiology.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Radiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Radiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Radiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Radiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025