Ray A. Field

34 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Ray A. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Animal Science and Zoology 302
  • General Decision Sciences 44
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 33
  • Marketing 122
  • Food Science 141
Replace Lynn Van Wezemael with:
Lynn Van Wezemael Belgium
Birger Boutrup Jensen Denmark
Bethany M. Sitz United States
J.F. Meullenet United States
Stanley M. Fletcher United States
Jens Oliver Kügler Denmark
Antje Risius Germany
Marie‐Eve Cousin Switzerland
Janneke de Jonge Netherlands
Simon Chege Kimenju Kenya
Ray A. Field relative to Lynn Van Wezemael Belgium Lynn Van Wezemael's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Lynn Van Wezemael · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ray A. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ray A. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ray A. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ray A. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ray A. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ray A. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ray A. Field. The network helps show where Ray A. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ray A. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ray A. Field Line = papers co-authored together Ray A. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993144
2 198982
3 197476
4 199244
5 199436
6 197135
7 199330
8 198130
9 199329
10 199521
11 200420
12 197218
13 197815
14 198814
15 198714
16 197013
17
Sheep and Wool: Science, Production and Management
198813
18 197212
19 197311
20 197911

About Ray A. Field

Ray A. Field is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Economics and Econometrics and Marketing, having authored 34 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (17 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (2 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (302 citations), General Decision Sciences (44 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (33 citations), Marketing (122 citations) and Food Science (141 citations). Ray A. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dale J. Menkhaus, Glen D. Whipple, Elizabeth Hoffman, M. L. Riley, Bibek Ray, Dipankar Chakravarti, W. G. KRUGGEL, Norasak Kalchayanand, M. C. Johnson and A.W. Kotula. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Agribusiness, Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Food Science and Marketing Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact