Phillip C. Easter

812 citations
9 papers · 646 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Phillip C. Easter

9 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

Phillip C. Easter
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Biological Psychiatry 39
  • Clinical Psychology 311
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 50
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 235
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 114
Replace Peggy Postma with:
Peggy Postma United Kingdom
Elisa Lorch United States
Barbara Hawellek Germany
Françoise Biver Belgium
Shauna N. MacMillan United States
Jeffrey J. Nutche United States
H.‐G. Weijers Germany
Nicole C. Barbarich-Marsteller United States
Erica L. Weiss United States
Matthew Kruse United States
Phillip C. Easter relative to Peggy Postma United Kingdom Peggy Postma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Peggy Postma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip C. Easter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip C. Easter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip C. Easter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip C. Easter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip C. Easter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip C. Easter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip C. Easter. The network helps show where Phillip C. Easter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip C. Easter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip C. Easter Line = papers co-authored together Phillip C. Easter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2007140
2 2005121
3 2008120
4 200977
5 200863
6 201162
7 200839
8 201015
9 20199

About Phillip C. Easter

Phillip C. Easter is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper), Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (39 citations), Clinical Psychology (311 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (50 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (235 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (114 citations). Phillip C. Easter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Rosenberg, Frank P. MacMaster, Michelle Rose, Yousha Mirza, Philip R. Szeszko, Shibany Preeya Taormina, Michelle Claire Lynch, Gregory J. Moore, Todd Lencz and Christopher J. Christian. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Imaging and Behavior, Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact