Philip Ash

29 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Philip Ash
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Psychology 20
  • Applied Psychology 41
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
  • Public Administration 23
  • Social Psychology 101
Replace Sidney Axelrad with:
Sidney Axelrad United States
H. Meltzer United States
Frank J. Atelsek United States
Jo-Ida C. Hansen United States
Leonard V. Gordon United States
Joseph Weitz United States
Bill O'Hanlon United States
Laurel W. Oliver United States
Larry W. Norton United States
F. K. Berrien United States
Philip Ash relative to Sidney Axelrad United States Sidney Axelrad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Sidney Axelrad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Ash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Ash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Ash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Ash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Ash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Ash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Ash. The network helps show where Philip Ash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Ash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Ash Line = papers co-authored together Philip Ash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195342
2 197141
3 201837
4 197432
5 197032
6 196632
7 201931
8 195230
9 195427
10 196925
11 198819
12 197213
13 197510
14 196610
15 19519
16 19749
17 19677
18 19886
19
OPTIMUM PHYSICAL VIEWING CONDITIONS FOR A REAR PROJECTION DAYLIGHT SCREEN.
19536
20 19884

About Philip Ash

Philip Ash is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Education and General Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation (2 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper) and Online and Blended Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (20 citations), Applied Psychology (41 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations), Public Administration (23 citations) and Social Psychology (101 citations). Philip Ash has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edward E. Abramson, Michael R. Cunningham, Erica K. Yuen, Renee B. Patrick, Lauren Wispé, William Hamilton, Leslie Hicks, Cynthia E. Gangi, Elizabeth M. Goetter and Shinobu Itoh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, American Psychologist, Journal of Business and Psychology, Personnel Psychology and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact