F. K. Berrien

765 citations
24 papers · 385 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

F. K. Berrien

24 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

F. K. Berrien
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Psychology 18
  • Social Psychology 120
  • Applied Psychology 20
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 43
  • Gender Studies 32
Replace Walter T. Plant with:
Walter T. Plant United States
John W. Gustad United States
John Forward United States
Jay Jackson United States
Aroldo Rodrígues Brazil
John W. Petras United States
Germaine de Montmollin United States
Donald S. Kumka United States
A. John Arrowood Canada
Dale O. Jorgenson United States
F. K. Berrien relative to Walter T. Plant United States Walter T. Plant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Walter T. Plant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. K. Berrien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. K. Berrien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. K. Berrien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. K. Berrien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. K. Berrien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. K. Berrien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. K. Berrien. The network helps show where F. K. Berrien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside F. K. Berrien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. K. Berrien Line = papers co-authored together F. K. Berrien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1952159
2 196947
3 196730
4 196727
5 195618
6 196711
7 195411
8 19669
9 19699
10 19688
11 19707
12 19656
13 19666
14 19546
15 19525
16 19515
17 19634
18 19704
19 19633
20 19693

About F. K. Berrien

F. K. Berrien is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cultural Studies and Applied Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper), Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (1 paper), Social Representations and Identity (1 paper), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (1 paper), Japanese History and Culture (1 paper) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (18 citations), Social Psychology (120 citations), Applied Psychology (20 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (43 citations) and Gender Studies (32 citations). F. K. Berrien has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Abram Kardiner, Lionel Ovesey, Bernard P. Indik, Mario Abate, Edwin Ε. Ghiselli, C. W. Brown, Abe Arkoff, Shinkuro Iwahara, Patricia C. Smith and Thomas A. Ryan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, International Journal of Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, American Sociological Review and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact