Philip A. Ebert
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 10%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 12
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
- Co-authors
- Ian Durbach (4 shared papers)Martin Smith (2 shared papers)Peter Milne (2 shared papers)Stewart Shapiro (1 shared paper)Roy T. Cook (3 shared papers)Gottlob Frege (1 shared paper)Michael Morreau (1 shared paper)Michael Beaney (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophia Mathematica (2 papers)Risk Analysis (1 paper)History and Philosophy of Logic (1 paper)dialectica (1 paper)The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip A. Ebert
25 papers receiving 194 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Theoretical Computer Science 18
- History and Philosophy of Science 47
- Philosophy 63
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
- General Decision Sciences 9
Countries citing papers authored by Philip A. Ebert
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip A. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip A. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip A. Ebert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip A. Ebert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip A. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip A. Ebert. The network helps show where Philip A. Ebert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Philip A. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 4 | Basic laws of arithmetic : derived using concept-script : Volumes I & II | 2013 | 14 |
| 5 | Gottlob Frege: Basic Laws of Arithmetic | 2013 | 12 |
| 6 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 3 |
About Philip A. Ebert
Philip A. Ebert is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Social Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Landslides and related hazards (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (18 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations), Philosophy (63 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (71 citations) and General Decision Sciences (9 citations). Philip A. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian Durbach, Martin Smith, Peter Milne, Stewart Shapiro, Roy T. Cook, Gottlob Frege, Michael Morreau, Michael Beaney, Theoni Photopoulou and David L. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophia Mathematica, Risk Analysis, History and Philosophy of Logic, dialectica and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.