Philip A. Ebert

516 citations
36 papers · 261 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Philip A. Ebert

32 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Philip A. Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Theoretical Computer Science 26
  • History and Philosophy of Science 66
  • General Decision Sciences 17
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
  • Philosophy 83
Replace Franz von Kutschera with:
Franz von Kutschera Germany
Matthias Varga von Kibéd Germany
A. W. Carus Germany
Brad Armendt United States
Augustus De Morgan United Kingdom
Joel Katzav Netherlands
Joseph Brent United States
Max Albert Germany
Mark Pastin United States
Nicholas Griffin Canada
Philip A. Ebert relative to Franz von Kutschera Germany Franz von Kutschera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Franz von Kutschera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip A. Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip A. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip A. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip A. Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip A. Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip A. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip A. Ebert. The network helps show where Philip A. Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Philip A. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip A. Ebert Line = papers co-authored together Philip A. Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201751
2 201730
3 201919
4
Basic laws of arithmetic : derived using concept-script : Volumes I & II
201316
5 200515
6
Gottlob Frege: Basic Laws of Arithmetic
201314
7 201611
8 200711
9 20229
10 20138
11 20217
12 20186
13 20226
14 20156
15 20096
16 20165
17 20165
18 20154
19 20164
20 20164

About Philip A. Ebert

Philip A. Ebert is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (16 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (5 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Landslides and related hazards (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (26 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (66 citations), General Decision Sciences (17 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations) and Philosophy (83 citations). Philip A. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Ian Durbach, Martin Smith, Peter Milne, Roy T. Cook, Stewart Shapiro, Gottlob Frege, Michael Beaney, Michael Morreau, Øystein Linnebo and Theoni Photopoulou. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophia Mathematica, History and Philosophy of Logic, Risk Analysis, Synthese and Journal of Organization Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact