Michael Beaney

38 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Michael Beaney
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • History and Philosophy of Science 167
  • Theoretical Computer Science 30
  • Philosophy 233
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 261
  • General Psychology 12
Replace Gottfried Gabriel with:
Gottfried Gabriel Germany
Benson Mates United States
Robert Stoothoff United Kingdom
Antoine Arnauld
David Bostock United Kingdom
Peter Remnant Canada
W. D. Hart United States
Kathrin Koslicki United States
J. Alberto Coffa United States
Gail Fine United States
Michael Beaney relative to Gottfried Gabriel Germany Gottfried Gabriel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Gottfried Gabriel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Beaney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Beaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Beaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Beaney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Beaney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Beaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Beaney. The network helps show where Michael Beaney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Michael Beaney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Beaney Line = papers co-authored together Michael Beaney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Frege reader
1997168
2 201381
3
Frege: Making Sense
199631
4
Basic laws of arithmetic : derived using concept-script : Volumes I & II
201314
5 201713
6 201310
7 201010
8
Conceptions of Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy
20009
9 20189
10
Explaining the Mental: Naturalist and Non-Naturalist Approaches to Mental Acts and Processes
20078
11 20078
12
Frege’s Notations: What They Are and How They Mean
20128
13 20138
14 20106
15 20106
16 20135
17 20085
18 20164
19 20214
20 20024

About Michael Beaney

Michael Beaney is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (2 papers) and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (167 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (30 citations), Philosophy (233 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (261 citations) and General Psychology (12 citations). Michael Beaney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Gottlob Frege, Gregory Landini, Carlo Penco, Philip A. Ebert, Erich H. Reck, Roy T. Cook, Thomas Uebel and Mogens Lærke. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Journal of the Philosophy of History, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact