Michael Morreau

1.0k citations
28 papers · 421 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Morreau

26 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Michael Morreau
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • History and Philosophy of Science 73
  • Philosophy 116
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
  • General Decision Sciences 16
  • Artificial Intelligence 216
Replace James Hawthorne with:
James Hawthorne United States
Rosanna Keefe United Kingdom
Peter Milne United Kingdom
Nicholas J. J. Smith Australia
Theo A. F. Kuipers Netherlands
Jan Woleński Poland
Benedikt Löwe Netherlands
J. E. J. Altham United States
Dag Westerståhl Sweden
Hans G. Herzberger Canada
Michael Morreau relative to James Hawthorne United States James Hawthorne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James Hawthorne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Morreau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Morreau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Morreau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Morreau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Morreau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Morreau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Morreau. The network helps show where Michael Morreau may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Michael Morreau, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Morreau Line = papers co-authored together Michael Morreau links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
What Some Generic Sentences Mean
199552
2 199251
3 199842
4 200037
5
Commonsense entailment: a modal theory of nonmonotonic reasoning
199131
6 200228
7 201024
8 199920
9 201516
10 199715
11 201314
12 201613
13 199211
14 199810
15 199610
16 20227
17 19997
18 20166
19 20206
20 20086

About Michael Morreau

Michael Morreau is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (6 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), Philosophy (116 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (216 citations). Michael Morreau has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Asher, Isaac Levi, John A. Weymark, Hirofumi Katsuno, Jon Doyle, Peter Gärdenfors, Sven Ove Hansson, Didier Dubois, Sarit Kraus and Hans Rott. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Erkenntnis, Studia Logica and Linguistics and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact