Peter Milne
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Papers in
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 16
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference 8
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 19
- Phonetics and Phonology Research 4
- Co-authors
- Graham Oddie (1 shared paper)Alan Musgrave (1 shared paper)Donald Gillies (1 shared paper)Peter Kosso (1 shared paper)Philip A. Ebert (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Analysis (10 papers)The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (6 papers)Erkenntnis (4 papers)Journal of Philosophical Logic (2 papers)Mind (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Peter Milne
52 papers receiving 422 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- History and Philosophy of Science 170
- General Decision Sciences 45
- Philosophy 188
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 178
- Artificial Intelligence 226
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Milne
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Milne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Milne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Milne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Milne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Milne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Milne. The network helps show where Peter Milne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Milne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 49 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1983 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 7 |
About Peter Milne
Peter Milne is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Philosophy, having authored 55 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (8 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (8 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (170 citations), General Decision Sciences (45 citations), Philosophy (188 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (178 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (226 citations). Peter Milne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Graham Oddie, Alan Musgrave, Donald Gillies, Peter Kosso and Philip A. Ebert. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Erkenntnis, Journal of Philosophical Logic and Mind.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.