Phil Foreman

39 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Phil Foreman
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 230
  • Occupational Therapy 72
  • Safety Research 130
  • Education 232
  • Medical Terminology 2
Replace Barbara Lee Wilcox with:
Barbara Lee Wilcox United States
Richard L. Luftig United States
Sarah Rule United States
Susan M. Hamre-Nietupski United States
June E. Downing United States
Sheila M. Bennett Canada
Kelly Kinnish United States
Jane Helen Soukup United States
Zach Rossetti United States
Colleen K. Moss United States
Phil Foreman relative to Barbara Lee Wilcox United States Barbara Lee Wilcox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
Barbara Lee Wilcox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Foreman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Foreman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Foreman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Foreman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Foreman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Foreman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Foreman. The network helps show where Phil Foreman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Phil Foreman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Foreman Line = papers co-authored together Phil Foreman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200497
2 199946
3
Inclusion in Action
200440
4 201339
5 199935
6 199732
7 200128
8 200125
9 201425
10 200823
11 200822
12 200520
13 200219
14 200718
15 199617
16 199817
17 200917
18 199715
19 201315
20 201114

About Phil Foreman

Phil Foreman is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Safety Research, Occupational Therapy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (14 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (13 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (11 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (5 papers), Disability Education and Employment (5 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers) and Disability Rights and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (230 citations), Occupational Therapy (72 citations), Safety Research (130 citations), Education (232 citations) and Medical Terminology (2 citations). Phil Foreman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Michael Arthur‐Kelly, Ian Dempsey, Susan Balandin, Bernice Mathisen, Keith B. G. Dear, Sonja Macfarlane, Dean Sutherland, Josephine C. Jenkinson, Greg Leigh and James Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, Australasian Journal of Special Education, European Journal of Special Needs Education, Developmental Neurorehabilitation and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact