Phil Dewe

1.4k citations
13 papers · 793 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Phil Dewe

11 papers receiving 712 citations

Peers

Phil Dewe
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 360
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Social Psychology 295
  • Gender Studies 125
  • General Health Professions 269
Replace Deborah J. Dwyer with:
Deborah J. Dwyer United States
Mervi Ruokolainen Finland
Tuija Muhonen Sweden
Allison Duke United States
Valentina Bruk‐Lee United States
Joanne Lyubovnikova United Kingdom
María Vera Spain
Lara Colombo Italy
Elpine M. de Boer Netherlands
Lisa A. Marchiondo United States
Phil Dewe relative to Deborah J. Dwyer United States Deborah J. Dwyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Deborah J. Dwyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Dewe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Dewe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Dewe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Dewe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Dewe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Dewe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Dewe. The network helps show where Phil Dewe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Dewe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Dewe Line = papers co-authored together Phil Dewe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2004358
2 2002197
3 198778
4 199964
5
A preliminary evaluation of the establishment of nurse, midwife and health visitor consultants
200136
6
Human resource management in multinational corporations: theories and models
199517
7
New organizational challenges for human service work
200313
8 199710
9 20179
10 20138
11
Aiding AIDS sufferers.
19862
12 20131
13 20070

About Phil Dewe

Phil Dewe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Pharmacology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (360 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations), Social Psychology (295 citations), Gender Studies (125 citations) and General Health Professions (269 citations). Phil Dewe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cary L. Cooper, Paul E. Spector, Juan I. Sánchez, Steven Poelmans, Michael P. O’Driscoll, Oi Ling Siu, Peter M. Hart, Luo Lu, Tammy D. Allen and Michael P. Leiter. Their work appears in journals such as Work & Stress, Personnel Psychology, Academy of Management Journal, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources and OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact