Phil Botham

17 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Phil Botham
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Small Animals 83
  • Chemical Health and Safety 7
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 88
  • Pharmacology 30
  • Cancer Research 47
Replace Thomas Cole with:
Thomas Cole Italy
Robert P. Felton United States
Irene Manou Germany
Kamala Pant United States
Richard Cubberley United Kingdom
Soledad Duk Chile
Jian‐Dong Duan United States
Eugene D. Barber United States
Hyun‐Ok Ku South Korea
Mohamed A.M. El Gendy Canada
Phil Botham relative to Thomas Cole Italy Thomas Cole's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Thomas Cole · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Botham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Botham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Botham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Botham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Botham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Botham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Botham. The network helps show where Phil Botham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Botham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Botham Line = papers co-authored together Phil Botham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2003101
2 200928
3 201228
4 202227
5 202027
6 200921
7 200817
8 200813
9 20148
10 20028
11 20246
12 20244
13 19933
14 20243
15
Alternative (non-animal) methods for chemicals testing: Current status and future prospects - Overview
20022
16
Why laboratory rats are here to stay.
19921
17 20251

About Phil Botham

Phil Botham is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research, Small Animals, Food Science and Plant Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (8 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (3 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (3 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers), Chemical Safety and Risk Management (2 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (83 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (7 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (88 citations), Pharmacology (30 citations) and Cancer Research (47 citations). Phil Botham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard Billington, Bennard van Ravenzwaay, Richard J. Lewis, David Eric Lees, Bernhard Stahl, Karin S. Bentley, Torbjörn Malmfors, Werner Kobel, Horst Spielmann and Jyotigna Mehta. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Reviews in Toxicology, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Human & Experimental Toxicology, Reproductive Toxicology and Toxicology in Vitro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact