Phil Botham
Impact in
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal testing and alternatives
- Dermatology top 5%
- Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Papers in
-
- Animal testing and alternatives 10
-
- Agricultural safety and regulations 5
- Co-authors
- Richard Billington (4 shared papers)Bennard van Ravenzwaay (4 shared papers)Bernhard U. Stahl (2 shared papers)Torbjörn Malmfors (1 shared paper)H. Paul A. Illing (1 shared paper)Horst Spielmann (2 shared papers)Alan R. Boobis (4 shared papers)Werner H. Bomann (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Critical Reviews in Toxicology (5 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (4 papers)Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (2 papers)Human & Experimental Toxicology (1 paper)Toxicological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Phil Botham
19 papers receiving 459 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Small Animals 178
- Dermatology 100
- Chemical Health and Safety 8
- Pharmaceutical Science 32
- Cancer Research 48
Countries citing papers authored by Phil Botham
This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Botham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Botham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Botham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Botham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Botham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Botham. The network helps show where Phil Botham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Botham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 192 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 102 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 17 | Why laboratory rats are here to stay. | 1992 | 1 |
| 18 | Alternative (non-animal) methods for chemicals testing: Current status and future prospects - Overview | 2002 | 1 |
| 19 | 2025 | 1 |
About Phil Botham
Phil Botham is a scholar working on Small Animals, Food Science, Cancer Research, Dermatology and Chemical Health and Safety, having authored 19 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (10 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (5 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (3 papers), Chemical Safety and Risk Management (1 paper), Occupational exposure and asthma (1 paper) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (178 citations), Dermatology (100 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (8 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (32 citations) and Cancer Research (48 citations). Phil Botham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard Billington, Bennard van Ravenzwaay, Bernhard U. Stahl, Torbjörn Malmfors, H. Paul A. Illing, Horst Spielmann, Alan R. Boobis, Werner H. Bomann, Marco Corvaro and Werner Kobel. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Reviews in Toxicology, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Human & Experimental Toxicology and Toxicological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.