Robert D. Combes

149 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Robert D. Combes
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Chemical Health and Safety 69
  • Small Animals 623
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 772
  • Cancer Research 608
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 503
Replace Johannes J.M. van de Sandt with:
Johannes J.M. van de Sandt Netherlands
Bas J. Blaauboer Netherlands
Alicia Paini Italy
Marilyn J. Aardema United States
David Kirkland United Kingdom
Bennard van Ravenzwaay Germany
David Brusick United States
Jan van Benthem Netherlands
Warren Casey United States
Kristine L. Witt United States
Robert D. Combes relative to Johannes J.M. van de Sandt Netherlands Johannes J.M. van de Sandt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Johannes J.M. van de Sandt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Combes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Combes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Combes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Combes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Combes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Combes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Combes. The network helps show where Robert D. Combes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert D. Combes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert D. Combes Line = papers co-authored together Robert D. Combes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 153 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982260
2 1995128
3 2008119
4 1998108
5 200585
6 199966
7 199861
8 200358
9 200356
10 199956
11 198056
12 199756
13 200645
14 200844
15 199241
16 200437
17 200037
18 199535
19 200730
20 198130

About Robert D. Combes

Robert D. Combes is a scholar working on Small Animals, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 153 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (56 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (49 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (37 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (21 papers), Dye analysis and toxicity (14 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (13 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (10 papers) and Agricultural safety and regulations (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (69 citations), Small Animals (623 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (772 citations), Cancer Research (608 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (503 citations). Robert D. Combes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Michael Balls, Christina Grindon, Aliuska Morales Helguera, M Cronin, Nirmala Bhogal, M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro, John F. Garrod, David W. Roberts, Deborah Dillon and Errol Zeiger. Their work appears in journals such as Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Toxicology in Vitro, Mutagenesis, Human & Experimental Toxicology and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact