Toxicological Sciences

8.1k papers and 315.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.1k papers published in Toxicological Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 315.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Toxicological Sciences usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2.8k papers), Molecular Biology (2.2k papers) and Cancer Research (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1.3k papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1.2k papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (858 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Toxicological Sciences are L. Earl Gray, C. W.-K. Lam, David B. Warheit, Curtis D. Klaassen, Vickie S. Wilson, Tingting Zhou, Tammy E. Stoker, Richard E. Peterson, J. Thomas Sanderson and Hisham K. Hamadeh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Toxicological Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Toxicological Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Toxicological Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Toxicological Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Toxicological Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Toxicological Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toxicological Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025