John E. Doe

2.5k citations
50 papers · 2.0k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Doe

48 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

John E. Doe
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Chemical Health and Safety 106
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 826
  • Small Animals 406
  • Cancer Research 625
  • Pharmacology 125
Replace Nancy G. Doerrer with:
Nancy G. Doerrer United States
Carolyn Vickers Switzerland
Timothy P. Pastoor United States
Susan P. Felter United States
Andrew Maier United States
Lutz Müller Germany
Edward W. Carney United States
Véronique Thybaud France
B. Bhaskar Gollapudi United States
Gail Charnley United States
John E. Doe relative to Nancy G. Doerrer United States Nancy G. Doerrer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Nancy G. Doerrer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Doe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Doe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Doe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Doe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Doe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Doe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Doe. The network helps show where John E. Doe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Doe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Doe Line = papers co-authored together John E. Doe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008447
2 2002208
3 2014109
4 2014100
5 202283
6 201979
7 200678
8 202275
9 201964
10 201664
11 200753
12 200650
13 201950
14 198348
15 201145
16
Potentiated reagin response to egg albumin in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infected rats. II. Time course of the reagin response.
197140
17 198438
18 201729
19 201026
20 198422

About John E. Doe

John E. Doe is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research, Small Animals, Chemical Health and Safety and Plant Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (24 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (21 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (14 papers), Chemical Safety and Risk Management (8 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (8 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (7 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (106 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (826 citations), Small Animals (406 citations), Cancer Research (625 citations) and Pharmacology (125 citations). John E. Doe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alan R. Boobis, Jennifer G. Seed, Josef R. Schlatter, Carolyn Vickers, Mary E. Meek, Douglas C. Wolf, Barbara Heinrich-Hirsch, Sharon Munn, Mathuros Ruchirawat and Timothy P. Pastoor. Their work appears in journals such as Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, Archives of Toxicology, Journal of Immunological Methods and Environmental Health Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact