Peter White

2.2k citations
46 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Peter White

44 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter White
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 789
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 431
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 210
  • Pharmacology 204
  • Cell Biology 119
Replace Ginger Polich with:
Ginger Polich United States
Susanne Jena Germany
Victoria Hadhazy United States
Richard C. Niemtzow United States
Ronald M. Glick United States
Peter Aker Canada
Alan H. Adams United States
Theresa Kay Canada
R. A. Deyo United States
Stephen J Burnie Canada
Peter White relative to Ginger Polich United States Ginger Polich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ginger Polich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter White. The network helps show where Peter White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter White Line = papers co-authored together Peter White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005307
2 2003186
3 2014170
4 2004144
5 2005107
6 201187
7 201077
8 200869
9 200456
10
A randomised controlled trial of three pragmatic approaches to initiate increased physical activity in sedentary patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
200450
11 201549
12 201043
13 200640
14 201138
15 201537
16 200231
17 201030
18 201122
19 201119
20 200614

About Peter White

Peter White is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and General Health Professions, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (23 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (18 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (18 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (789 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (431 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (210 citations), Pharmacology (204 citations) and Cell Biology (119 citations). Peter White has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include George Lewith, P. Prescott, Jérémie Pariente, Alan Tennant, Paula Kersten, R. S. J. Frackowiak, Val Hopwood, Joy Conway, Paul Little and Felicity L. Bishop. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Acupuncture in Medicine, Clinical Journal of Pain and British Journal of General Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact