Ginger Polich

1.8k citations
23 papers · 1.4k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ginger Polich

23 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ginger Polich
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 555
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 531
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 312
  • Physiology 222
  • Neurology 106
Replace Claire McManus with:
Claire McManus United States
Terry Selfe United States
Konrad Streitberger Germany
Antoinette I. M. van Laarhoven Netherlands
Disa J. Smee Australia
Joseph M. Northey Australia
Indrė Bilevičiūtė-Ljungar Sweden
Sangeetha Nayak United States
Iris Burman United States
Oliver Riedel Germany
Ginger Polich relative to Claire McManus United States Claire McManus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Claire McManus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ginger Polich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ginger Polich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ginger Polich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ginger Polich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ginger Polich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ginger Polich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ginger Polich. The network helps show where Ginger Polich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ginger Polich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ginger Polich Line = papers co-authored together Ginger Polich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007286
2 2008208
3 2020187
4 2009124
5 2008122
6 200781
7 200772
8 201069
9 202149
10 201844
11 200927
12 201926
13 201925
14 201117
15 202310
16 20209
17 20209
18 20227
19 20245
20 20205

About Ginger Polich

Ginger Polich is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Complementary and alternative medicine, Neurology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (6 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (555 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (531 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (312 citations), Physiology (222 citations) and Neurology (106 citations). Ginger Polich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ted J. Kaptchuk, Jian Kong, Randy L. Gollub, Márk Vangel, Bruce R. Rosen, Irving Kirsch, Carolyn Zyloney, Peter S. LaViolette, Tao Huang and Kathleen K.S. Hui. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, NeuroImage, Journal of Neurotrauma, Handbook of clinical neurology and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact