Acupuncture in Medicine

1.3k papers and 19.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Acupuncture in Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 19.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Acupuncture in Medicine usually cover Complementary and alternative medicine (1.0k papers), Pharmacology (324 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (274 papers) specifically the topics of Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (979 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (390 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (252 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acupuncture in Medicine are Adrian White, Adam Ward, Thomas Lundeberg, Mike Cummings, Anthony Campbell, Iréne Lund, Michael A. Adams, Christer Carlsson, Hugh MacPherson and Peter Baldry.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acupuncture in Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acupuncture in Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acupuncture in Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Acupuncture in Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acupuncture in Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acupuncture in Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acupuncture in Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025