Clinical Journal of Pain

3.3k papers and 133.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in Clinical Journal of Pain in the last decades have received a total of 133.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Journal of Pain usually cover Pharmacology (1.5k papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (781 papers) and Physiology (770 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1.4k papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (694 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (592 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Journal of Pain are Alan M. Harvey, Dennis C. Turk, Mark P. Jensen, Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, Steven J. Linton, Lars Arendt‐Nielsen, Michael E. Robinson, Céleste Johnston, Francis J. Keefe and Kenneth E. Schmader.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Journal of Pain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Journal of Pain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Journal of Pain.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Journal of Pain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Journal of Pain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Journal of Pain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Journal of Pain more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025