Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

257.7k citations
12.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies 1.1k
    • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 772
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies 581
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 473
    • Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds 839

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

10.7k papers receiving 238.2k citations

Peers

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 49.9k
  • Pharmacology 27.9k
  • Biochemistry 15.0k
  • Pharmacology 28.6k
  • Food Science 25.8k
Replace Phytomedicine with:
Phytomedicine China
Phytotherapy Research China
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy China
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine China
Planta Medica Germany
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis China
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Japan
Frontiers in Pharmacology China
Fitoterapia China
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology United Kingdom
Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine relative to Phytomedicine China Phytomedicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Phytomedicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

About Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

The 12.0k papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 257.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine usually cover Complementary and alternative medicine (3.1k papers), Pharmacology (1.7k papers), Pharmacology (1.6k papers), Biochemistry (489 papers) and Biological Psychiatry (152 papers) specifically the topics of Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (1.1k papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (839 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (772 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (581 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (563 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (524 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (473 papers) and Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (454 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine are Edwin L. Cooper, Mohammad A. Alzohairy, Vassya Bankova, Enzo A. Palombo, Jie Wang, Mohamad Fawzi Mahomoodally, Siew Hua Gan, Gerhard Litscher, Fabio Firenzuoli and Luigi Gori.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact