Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

273.5k citations
12.0k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

    • Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies 1.1k
    • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 774
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies 582
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 474
    • Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds 845

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

10.8k papers receiving 251.5k citations

Peers

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 53.0k
  • Pharmacology 29.7k
  • Biochemistry 16.1k
  • Pharmacology 30.5k
  • Food Science 27.6k
Replace Phytomedicine with:
Phytomedicine China
Phytotherapy Research China
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy China
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine China
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis China
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Japan
Planta Medica Germany
Fitoterapia China
BioMed Research International China
Frontiers in Pharmacology China
Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine relative to Phytomedicine China Phytomedicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Phytomedicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

About Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

The 12.0k papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 273.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine usually cover Complementary and alternative medicine (3.1k papers), Pharmacology (1.7k papers), Pharmacology (1.6k papers), Biochemistry (490 papers) and Biological Psychiatry (152 papers) specifically the topics of Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (1.1k papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (845 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (774 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (582 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (562 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (528 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (474 papers) and Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (454 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine are Edwin Lowell Cooper, Mohammad Abdulrahman Alzohairy, Vassya Stefanova Bankova, Enzo A. Palombo, Mohamad Fawzi Mahomoodally, Gerhard Litscher, Jie Wang, Fabio Firenzuoli, Luigi Gori and Siew Hua Gan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact