Peter Smith

456 citations
40 papers · 337 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Smith

34 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Peter Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 60
  • Strategy and Management 58
  • Communication 26
  • Safety Research 28
  • Clinical Psychology 58
Replace Moira Cachia with:
Moira Cachia United Kingdom
Nicola McNeil Australia
Elizabeth Craig United States
Sue Whittle United Kingdom
Renée M. Betancourt United States
Karen O’Brien United States
Heather E. Canary United States
Allison Traylor United States
Ian T. Adams United States
Lara Carminati Netherlands
Peter Smith relative to Moira Cachia United Kingdom Moira Cachia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Moira Cachia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Smith. The network helps show where Peter Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Smith Line = papers co-authored together Peter Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200366
2 198739
3 201228
4 202027
5 202023
6 200421
7 198619
8 201314
9 201611
10 201910
11 20189
12 20218
13 20226
14 19916
15 20245
16 20055
17 20205
18 20145
19 20174
20 20034

About Peter Smith

Peter Smith is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Management Information Systems and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 40 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (2 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (60 citations), Strategy and Management (58 citations), Communication (26 citations), Safety Research (28 citations) and Clinical Psychology (58 citations). Peter Smith has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rosemary French, Desmond Doran, Gloria L. Ge, William R. Morton, G Knitter, Helena D. Cooper–Thomas, Roy K. Smollan, Kathleen G. Dobson, Christoph F. Breidbach and Cameron Mustard. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Innovation Management, American Journal of Epidemiology, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Accounting and Business Research and Adoption & Fostering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact