Accounting and Business Research

1.5k papers and 43.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Accounting and Business Research in the last decades have received a total of 43.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Accounting and Business Research usually cover Accounting (937 papers), Strategy and Management (445 papers) and Management Information Systems (291 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (740 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (415 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (344 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounting and Business Research are T. E. Cooke, Craig Deegan, Ray Ball, Christopher Nobes, Lee D. Parker, Martin Walker, Richard Pike, Richard Taffler, John Forker and Ben Gordon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Accounting and Business Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounting and Business Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounting and Business Research.

Countries where authors publish in Accounting and Business Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounting and Business Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounting and Business Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounting and Business Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025