Peter Oakes

42 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Oakes
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 200
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 297
  • Clinical Psychology 305
  • Occupational Therapy 54
  • Safety Research 108
Replace James Hogg with:
James Hogg United Kingdom
Simon Whitaker United Kingdom
Alison Alborz United Kingdom
Jan Burns United Kingdom
Developmental Disabilities
Keith McVilly Australia
Sharon A. Borthwick-Duffy United States
Giulia Balboni Italy
Scott Spreat United States
Jennifer Yu United States
Peter Oakes relative to James Hogg United Kingdom James Hogg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
James Hogg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Oakes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Oakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Oakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Oakes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Oakes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Oakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Oakes. The network helps show where Peter Oakes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Oakes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Oakes Line = papers co-authored together Peter Oakes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001299
2
Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2006
2006228
3 201390
4 200669
5 200368
6
The impact of person centred planning.
200558
7 200645
8 200838
9 201635
10 200735
11 200734
12 199530
13 199625
14 200822
15 200821
16 200318
17 200512
18 201711
19 201211
20
Rome in the Bible and The early Church
20029

About Peter Oakes

Peter Oakes is a scholar working on Education, Clinical Psychology, Religious studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (11 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (7 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (5 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (200 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (297 citations), Clinical Psychology (305 citations), Occupational Therapy (54 citations) and Safety Research (108 citations). Peter Oakes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and Zambia. Frequent co-authors include Miriam Silver, Paul Swift, Eric Emerson, Martín Knapp, Emma Krinjen‐Kemp, Renée Romeo, Martin Routledge, Barbara McIntosh, Chris Hatton and Caroline White. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Journal for the Study of the New Testament, The Journal of Adult Protection and Tyndale Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact