Journal for the Study of the New Testament

3.2k citations
865 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies
    • Christian Theology and Mission
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 716
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies 136
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 118
    • Christian Theology and Mission 65
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 225

Journal for the Study of the New Testament

583 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Religious studies 2.4k
  • Archeology 1.1k
  • Development 180
  • Anthropology 350
  • Classics 138
Replace Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology with:
Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology United States
Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture United States
Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft United States
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament United States
Biblical Interpretation United States
Journal for the Study of Judaism United States
Journal of Semitic Studies United Kingdom
Novum Testamentum United States
The Expository Times United Kingdom
Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft Germany
Journal for the Study of the New Testament relative to Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology United States Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal for the Study of the New Testament

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal for the Study of the New Testament. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal for the Study of the New Testament with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal for the Study of the New Testament more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal for the Study of the New Testament

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal for the Study of the New Testament. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal for the Study of the New Testament.

About Journal for the Study of the New Testament

The 865 papers published in Journal for the Study of the New Testament in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal for the Study of the New Testament usually cover Religious studies (733 papers), Archeology (281 papers), Development (63 papers), Sociology and Political Science (409 papers) and Anthropology (62 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (716 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (313 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (225 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (136 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (118 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (65 papers), Development, Ethics, and Society (63 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal for the Study of the New Testament are Hyam Maccoby, John M. G. Barclay, Richard A. Horsley, Steven J. Friesen, Peter M. Oakes, James Anthony Kelhoffer, James Carleton Paget, David G. Horrell, David C. Sim and Musa W. Dube.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact