The Journal of Adult Protection

547 papers and 3.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 547 papers published in The Journal of Adult Protection in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Adult Protection usually cover Demography (376 papers), Clinical Psychology (192 papers) and Education (179 papers) specifically the topics of Elder Abuse and Neglect (374 papers), Personalisation of Social Care Services (175 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Adult Protection are Michael Preston‐Shoot, Margaret Flynn, Jill Manthorpe, Hilary Brown, Jonathan Parker, Thomas Goergen, Ian Cummins, Bridget Penhale, Paul Cambridge and Alison Faulkner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Adult Protection

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Adult Protection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Adult Protection.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Adult Protection

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Adult Protection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Adult Protection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Adult Protection more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025