Miriam Silver

734 citations
12 papers · 496 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Miriam Silver

11 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

Miriam Silver
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 237
  • Occupational Therapy 41
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 106
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 102
  • Clinical Psychology 142
Replace Gemma Williams with:
Gemma Williams United Kingdom
LeAnne Johnson United States
Katerina Dounavi United Kingdom
Melanie Pellecchia United States
Melissa J. Herzog United States
Ronald E. Reeve United States
Heather K. Jennett United States
Shahla Ala’i-Rosales United States
Annemiek Palmen Netherlands
Flavia Lecciso Italy
Miriam Silver relative to Gemma Williams United Kingdom Gemma Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Gemma Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miriam Silver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miriam Silver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miriam Silver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miriam Silver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miriam Silver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miriam Silver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miriam Silver. The network helps show where Miriam Silver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Miriam Silver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Miriam Silver Line = papers co-authored together Miriam Silver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2001299
2 199855
3 200148
4 200739
5 201019
6 200714
7 20237
8 19977
9 20155
10
Psychologists as expert witnesses in the Family Courts in England and Wales: Standards, competencies and expectations: Guidance from the Family Justice Council and the British Psychological Society. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
20162
11 20231
12 20250

About Miriam Silver

Miriam Silver is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (237 citations), Occupational Therapy (41 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (106 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (102 citations) and Clinical Psychology (142 citations). Miriam Silver has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Oakes, Esme Moniz‐Cook, Sharon Agar, Bob Woods, Eric Gardiner, Thein Win, Dawn Millington, Kim Golding, Caroline Roberts and Saul Hillman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Child Abuse & Neglect, Health & Social Care in the Community, Autism and Children and Youth Services Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact