Peter Bowie

1.0k citations
29 papers · 750 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Bowie

28 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Peter Bowie
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 259
  • Family Practice 45
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 192
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 45
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 19
Replace Stephan Mühlig with:
Stephan Mühlig Germany
Seyed Kazem Malakouti Iran
Stewart Richmond United Kingdom
Jesús López‐Torres Hidalgo Spain
Martin Frisher United Kingdom
Caterina Vicens Spain
Mukaila Raji United States
Norman L. Keltner United States
Lewei Lin United States
Raisa Laaksonen Finland
Peter Bowie relative to Stephan Mühlig Germany Stephan Mühlig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Stephan Mühlig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bowie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bowie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bowie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bowie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bowie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bowie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bowie. The network helps show where Peter Bowie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bowie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Bowie Line = papers co-authored together Peter Bowie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006264
2 200778
3 200658
4 199943
5 200040
6 199338
7 200732
8 198527
9 201524
10 200924
11 200723
12 200717
13 199214
14 199312
15 19889
16 19878
17 19897
18 19987
19 20085
20 20225

About Peter Bowie

Peter Bowie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (3 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (259 citations), Family Practice (45 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (192 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (45 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (19 citations). Peter Bowie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include David K. Raynor, David P Alldred, Duncan Petty, Arnold Zermansky, Nick Freemantle, Joanne Eastaugh, Gail Mountain, R.A. Cox, Shazia Akhtar and Chris J. A. Moulin. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Age and Ageing, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Health Technology Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact