Peter Bowie

29 papers receiving 752 citations

Peers

Peter Bowie
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 199
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 162
  • Family Practice 15
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 36
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
Replace Stephan Mühlig with:
Stephan Mühlig Germany
Giuseppina Dell’Aquila Italy
Kathrin Heser Germany
Amanda Leggett United States
Marion Eisele Germany
Benjamin H. Han United States
Seyed Kazem Malakouti Iran
Brian R. Ballinger United Kingdom
Kathryn Knott United States
Christina Daskalopoulou United Kingdom
Peter Bowie relative to Stephan Mühlig Germany Stephan Mühlig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Stephan Mühlig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bowie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bowie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bowie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bowie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bowie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bowie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bowie. The network helps show where Peter Bowie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bowie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Bowie Line = papers co-authored together Peter Bowie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006275
2 200780
3 200658
4 199944
5 200040
6 199339
7 200733
8 198528
9 201526
10 200724
11 200924
12 199723
13 200717
14 199214
15 199312
16 198810
17 19879
18 20228
19 19987
20 19897

About Peter Bowie

Peter Bowie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers) and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (199 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (162 citations), Family Practice (15 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (36 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (16 citations). Peter Bowie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Gail Mountain, David K. Raynor, Duncan Petty, David P Alldred, Arnold Zermansky, Joanne Eastaugh, Nick Freemantle, R.A. Cox, Shazia Akhtar and Chris J. A. Moulin. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Age and Ageing and Journal of Hospital Infection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact