Péter Bodrogi

45 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Péter Bodrogi
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Social Psychology 329
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 305
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 144
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Sensory Systems 29
Replace João M. M. Linhares with:
João M. M. Linhares Portugal
Ming Ronnier Luo United Kingdom
Daniele Zavagno Italy
Zheng Huang China
Miyoshi Ayama Japan
Michael Royer United States
Sophie Jost France
Pei‐Li Sun Taiwan
Ralph W. Pridmore Australia
Youngshin Kwak South Korea
Péter Bodrogi relative to João M. M. Linhares Portugal João M. M. Linhares's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
João M. M. Linhares · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Péter Bodrogi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Bodrogi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Bodrogi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Bodrogi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Bodrogi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Bodrogi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Bodrogi. The network helps show where Péter Bodrogi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Péter Bodrogi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Péter Bodrogi Line = papers co-authored together Péter Bodrogi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200978
2 200142
3 200335
4
Colour Rendering of white LED Light Sources
200735
5 200829
6 201026
7
Why does the CIE Colour Rendering Index fail for white RGB LED light sources
200423
8 201121
9 200618
10 201216
11 201413
12 200713
13 201713
14 199512
15 201312
16 201512
17 202011
18 201811
19 201710
20 20129

About Péter Bodrogi

Péter Bodrogi is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Global and Planetary Change and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color Science and Applications (33 papers), Color perception and design (30 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (9 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (2 papers) and Image Enhancement Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (329 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (305 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (144 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations) and Sensory Systems (29 citations). Péter Bodrogi has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hungary and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Tran Quoc Khanh, Janos D. Schanda, Ferenc Szabó, Stefan Brückner, Holger Winkler, Du‐Sik Park, Gunilla A. M. Derefeldt, Youngshin Kwak, Sebastian Fischer and Ming Ronnier Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Color Research & Application, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Displays, Lighting Research & Technology and Perception.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact