J. Schanda

90 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

J. Schanda
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Social Psychology 480
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 629
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 245
  • Global and Planetary Change 182
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 169
Replace Wouter Ryckaert with:
Wouter Ryckaert Belgium
Kevin Smet Belgium
Michael Royer United States
Péter Bodrogi Germany
Ming Ronnier Luo China
Ming Ronnier Luo China
Yandan Lin China
William A. Thornton United States
Haisong Xu China
Changjun Li China
J. Schanda relative to Wouter Ryckaert Belgium Wouter Ryckaert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wouter Ryckaert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Schanda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Schanda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Schanda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Schanda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Schanda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Schanda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Schanda. The network helps show where J. Schanda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Schanda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Schanda Line = papers co-authored together J. Schanda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201394
2 197786
3 200684
4 200979
5 200160
6 200947
7 200435
8 198532
9 201427
10 201525
11 201224
12 200224
13 201524
14
Why does the CIE Colour Rendering Index fail for white RGB LED light sources
200424
15 197823
16 200823
17 200922
18 201421
19 201520
20 201417

About J. Schanda

J. Schanda is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Materials Chemistry, having authored 103 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color Science and Applications (59 papers), Color perception and design (36 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (13 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (11 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (10 papers), Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (5 papers) and Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (480 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (629 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (245 citations), Global and Planetary Change (182 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (169 citations). J. Schanda has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ferenc Szabó, Péter Bodrogi, Noémi Sándor, Lorne Whitehead, Cecília Sik‐Lányi, M. Gál, Kevin Smet, Ronnier Luo, Mark S. Rea and P.L. Walraven. Their work appears in journals such as Color Research & Application, Lighting Research & Technology, Displays, Journal of Luminescence and physica status solidi (b).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact