Michael Pointer

138 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Michael Pointer
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.6k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 754
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 532
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 64
Replace Manuel Melgosa with:
Manuel Melgosa Spain
Sérgio Nascimento Portugal
Guihua Cui China
Changjun Li China
Peter Hanselaer Belgium
Robert W. G. Hunt United Kingdom
Roy S. Berns United States
David L. MacAdam United States
Stephen Westland United Kingdom
Günter Wyszecki Canada
Michael Pointer relative to Manuel Melgosa Spain Manuel Melgosa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Manuel Melgosa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pointer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pointer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pointer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pointer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pointer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pointer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pointer. The network helps show where Michael Pointer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pointer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Pointer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Pointer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 147 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002268
2 2011253
3 1980162
4 2017157
5 2009131
6 199899
7 201197
8 201090
9 201081
10 198179
11 198573
12 201271
13 200864
14 201344
15 198633
16 201033
17 201931
18 200030
19 201727
20 202025

About Michael Pointer

Michael Pointer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Archeology, having authored 147 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color Science and Applications (118 papers), Color perception and design (90 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (47 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (21 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (14 papers), Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (13 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (7 papers) and Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.1k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.6k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (754 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (532 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (64 citations). Michael Pointer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. G. Hunt, Peter Hanselaer, G.G. Attridge, Kevin Smet, Geert Deconinck, Wouter Ryckaert, Changjun Li, Ming Ronnier Luo, Frédéric Leloup and Kaida Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as Color Research & Application, Optics Express, The Imaging Science Journal, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Journal of Imaging Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact