Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

76.6k citations
3.7k papers · · active since 1981

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Papers in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 308
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 168
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 157
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research 112
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 1.9k

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

3.5k papers receiving 71.6k citations

Peers

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Ophthalmology 14.9k
  • Epidemiology 34.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 11.4k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 7.2k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 7.7k
Replace Journal of Neurology with:
Journal of Neurology Germany
Optometry and Vision Science United States
Clinical and Experimental Optometry Australia
The Lancet Neurology United States
Frontiers in Neurology China
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease United States
European Journal of Neurology Italy
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience China
Ageing Research Reviews United States
Current Opinion in Neurology United States
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics relative to Journal of Neurology Germany Journal of Neurology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Journal of Neurology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics.

About Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

The 3.7k papers published in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics in the last decades have received a total of 76.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics usually cover Ophthalmology (796 papers), Epidemiology (1.9k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (907 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (341 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (380 papers) specifically the topics of Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1.9k papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (886 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (325 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (308 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (225 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (168 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (157 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics are Richard A. Armstrong, W. N. Charman, Mark Rosenfield, Bruce J. W. Evans, David B. Elliott, Seang‐Mei Saw, David A. Atchison, Bernard Gilmartin, William Frith Harris and Jennifer Birch.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact