Countries where authors publish in Color Research & Application
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Color Research & Application. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Color Research & Application with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Color Research & Application more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Color Research & Application
This network shows the impact of papers published in Color Research & Application. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Color Research & Application.
About Color Research & Application
The 2.6k papers published in Color Research & Application in the last decades have received a total of 52.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Color Research & Application usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.8k papers), Social Psychology (569 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (205 papers), Archeology (107 papers) and Orthodontics (31 papers) specifically the topics of Color Science and Applications (1.8k papers), Color perception and design (553 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (187 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (102 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (73 papers), Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (37 papers), Pigment Synthesis and Properties (35 papers) and Dental materials and restorations (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Color Research & Application are Michael H. Brill, Calvin S. McCamy, Ming Ronnier Luo, Steven A. Shafer, Alan Robertson, Rolf G. Kuehni, Roy S. Berns, Guihua Cui, B. Rigg and Mark D. Fairchild.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.